Today's News
Today's News
This Issue
Letters to the Editor
Contributors

Letters to the Editor

I deeply appreciate your article regarding the need to defend our nation, possibly with war. However, I believe the situation regarding the U.S.'s will and ability to successfully fight on the level that is needed has deteriorated too far to actually turn around and come back - short of divine intervention. The several factors: (1) the historical (1990s) massive reduction of our military and its ordinance along with the great security compromises of our nuclear and missile secrets of that era, (2) the willful avoidance of securing our borders, (3) the effort to create a super-state that absorbs the economic and social problems (including criminals) of Mexico and Canada, (4) the dogged determination by the Islamic terrorists to blow up America, (5) America's preoccupation with all sorts of violent and depraved entertainment and behavior, plus (6) the constant liberal, anti-war propaganda - have both of those pillars to a good defense (i.e., will and ability) in a decrepit state.

I am totally convinced that it is now only a matter of time before the enemies of the United States are finally able to tangibly express their hatred towards this nation. We have but a few short years. The efforts by the elites toward an A.D. 2010 proposed deadline for the North American super-state has all but assured our demise, due to the forced and sustained vulnerability placed on this nation's borders to accomplish that goal. After the U.S. has finally collapsed, the E.U. will valiantly attempt to speed up the New World Order in the West. But you cannot change the mindset of extreme ideologues: the Islamic terrorists including Iran (and other agreeable Islamic nations) partnered with communist China and Russia. The second conflagration will be between Europe and the East.

The current geopolitical scenario, then, is classic bipolar East-West. The Western dream of an economic, materialist New World Order is going to be abruptly and devastatingly interrupted by the drive of the East under its bi-fold ideology. What is truly pitiful is that if the East wins, then the battle then will be Islam versus communism. Without divine intervention, only the roaches, bacteria, and fungi will survive - and a little hardy foliage. We will be basically a dead planet.

I apologize for such a depressing point of view. I submit it to you on an intellectual basis. I believe that modern civilization as a whole has crossed the point of no return. Man does not have within himself the wisdom to recant from ideological hatred, violent and immoral depravity, and anti-God, materialist utopianism. When biblical Christianity is pushed aside, evil prospers. I have concluded that we are in the scripturally predicted return of the Days of Noah. To me, the evidence strongly suggests such.

On the positive side, I see a great Christian revival occurring on a global level. It is a great harvest of souls just prior to upcoming global disaster; just as the Great Awakening preceded the Revolutionary War, and the revivalism of the early-to-mid nineteenth century preceded the Civil War.

Thank you for your time. I enjoy your articles. God bless you to continue in your work and to be a strong influence.

Rev. John P. Reynolds

Thanks for your excellent article today. Please keep saying this message over and over again!

I recognize that a broadly seen article needs to be more circumspect, but I don't need to be in this private communication with you. So here are some points without regard to political correctness or the need to stay "moderate", or your own realistic requirements for restraint (no criticism intended, just a recognition of reality):

You can quote or paraphrase any of the above, but please do not in any way attribute it to me.

Thanks again for your excellent article.

(Name withheld)
Former Captain, and War Planner - USAF

I very much enjoy your articles, finding that they are spot one every time. However, the other day, Michelle Malkin wrote an article about the enemy. I agree with what she said, and would ask you to consider it, also.

She said that it is Islam that is our enemy, not Islam hyphenated with something else. Her point was that we must stop calling Islam a religion of peace because it is not, regardless of how many times it is described as such. Islam is a violent, fanatical cult that converts by violence. They may start out gently, but as they pull a person into the web, the "victim" finds that the only way out is conversion. If conversion does not happen, or if one tries to leave Islam, death is to be the answer. No one can leave Islam after becoming a muslim. Period.

The two newsmen who were recently released both converted to Islam - not out of honest love for the cult - but out of fear for their own lives. They converted at the end of a gun barrel. Had they not converted they would not have come home under their own power, but in body bags. Now they cannot stand up in front of a camera and renege, saying, "I had my fingers crossed." If they do, they mark themselves doomed. They would be gunned down the first time an Islamic person had the chance.

So please stop watering down the message. The message is: Islam is the enemy. That should be clear to all.

Bob Giese
Pensacola, Fl


Comment on this article | Printer friendly version