eco•logic Powerhouse logo

December 2005     



Eco-Imperialism
and the drive to destroy
the free market

By Tom DeWeese

Max Keiser is a new kind of terrorist. He uses the internet and boycotts to manipulate stock prices. In that way, he forces corporations to comply with his brand of radical environmentalism and Sustainable Development. He puts his hands around corporate throats, and squeezes until they comply with his demands. Max Keiser, and his ilk, hate business, and they hate free enterprise, and are using these tactics to redistribute wealth and cause chaos in the market place.
Max Keiser

Max Keiser
"Broker of Dissent"



KarmaBanque: "We crunch the numbers and recommend the best hedge-fund-baiting boycotts."

Just a few of the selected boycotts underway...

Coca-Cola

McDonald's

Exxon Mobil

Microsoft

Starbucks

Wal-Mart

ClearChannel

Monsanto

Shell

Movie Gallery

Procter & Gamble

Abernathy & Fitch

Disney

Nike

Altria/Phillip Morris

Citigroup

Ryanair

Caterpillar

Pfizer

GAP

...and activists they support...

Greenpeace International

Amnesty International

Keiser's operation is called "KarmaBanque." That new age-focused name alone should give readers an idea of the wacky worldview that spews from Keiser's brain. But, his brand of activism is much more sinister. He calls himself a financial anarchist, and he and his partner, Stacy Herbert, consider themselves the "Bonnie and Clyde of the Internet." In their own words:

"KarmaBanque is at the center of a new activist movement, which combines the civil disobedience of Gandhi, with the financial savvy of George Soros, to help change the economic and political landscape of the world!"

Says Keiser's web page:

"Karmabanque describes its audience as 'Activists, Anarchists, and Hedge Funds.' It's a stock exchange of sorts, but with a brilliant and maniacal twist: it trades on the strength of boycotts."

To put it in the simplest possible terms, Keiser targets companies that are vulnerable to boycotts, such as Coca Cola, which relies heavily on daily consumer buying. Once the boycott has begun, Keiser tells his minions to buy options on the targeted company's stock - options betting that the stock price will go down. As the boycott drags down the company's stock, Keiser and his followers make a quick buck on the options.

Meanwhile, the company, aware of what has happened to it, tries to strike a deal with Keiser to get the boycott stopped. The deal? Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). That is a euphemism for Sustainable Development. In other words, corporations are blackmailed into using their profits to promote the Kyoto Global Warming Treaty, for example. Such tactics have been used to stop banks from financing development in Third World countries, because for these poor people to acquire luxuries, such as electricity and clean water, is, in the minds of Max Keiser and his gang, "unsustainable," and must be stopped.

Watch the television commercials for General Electric, and Exxon, as they gleefully tell consumers of the virtues of cutting back on energy use and gas consumption. If you have ever thought that such messages seem to go against what these companies should be selling, you are right. They have been twisted into a grotesque characterization of themselves, by the internet Gandhi-like Max Keiser. They are smart, mean Zealots to their cause. And, their goal is worldwide wealth redistribution, achieved by sucking the lifeblood out of private companies.

And, if anyone disagrees with Keiser's tactics, or advocates a difference of opinion, he attacks. Case in point: a new mutual fund called the Free Enterprise Action Fund (FEAF) has been established by two champions of free enterprise, Steve Milloy and Tom Borelli. FEAF has been openly calling on corporations in which it has invested, to ignore the pressures of the radical greens, and stick to the business of real growth strategies, not "feel good" social programs. Milloy and Borelli have been courageous in their fight to save the free enterprise system from the gonzo assault of the Max Keisers who are bent on destroying it.

Naturally, the Free Enterprise Action Fund is a threat to Keiser's plans to make corporations slaves to his radical socialist agenda. As a result, Keiser has attacked FEAF with a vengeance. His web site is filled with attacks on Milloy and Borelli, calling them "brown shirts," and denounced FEAF as an "appeaser to global warming and climate change terrorists." On a recent broadcast of his radio program, KarmaBanque Radio, incredibly, Keiser went on a ten-minute diatribe against the evils of Milloy and Borelli, simply because they disagree with his worldview. Keiser ended by spewing out that Milloy and Borelli were stealing the future from their own children, and he went on to say, "I think the kids, the children of these people, (Milloy and Borelli) should knife them."

Considering Keiser's bravado about being the Bonnie and Clyde of the Internet, one would expect that his own copy of the broadcast would be displayed prominently on his web site, as are several other such diatribes. But after Borelli and Milloy began to fight back, exposing his hate speech, Keiser showed what a true coward he is, as the file disappeared. Luckily, Milloy and Borelli made a copy. Readers can hear the actual broadcast at: www.junkscience.com/KARMABanque_Podcast_092805.mp3. As a point of reference, Bonnie and Clyde were not heroes, or role models. They, too, hated the free enterprise system, and stole from it, as they killed people.

Now, Keiser is scheduled to speak at an event in Frankfurt, Germany, called the Triple Bottom Line Investing Conference. This is not a conference that most would want to attend. It is a gathering of radicals who advocate Corporate Social Responsibility. Like Keiser, those who will attend are part of the movement which demands that businesses toe their strict anti-business line. Once a business complies, the demands become even more radical - the bar is continually raised. That's what this conference is all about. It's the "Who's Who" of radical, anti-free market investing.

A main sponsor of the conference is the Calvert Fund. They are basically paying the conference bills. Calvert is a $10 billion investment company for the Corporate Social Responsibility Crowd. They, too, engage in shareholder activism to get companies to adopt their social agenda. Calvert, in spite of its radical agenda, tries to pass itself off as responsible and civilized. So, all of corporate America should be asking Calvert why they are paying to bring a terrorist, who spews hate speech and advocates violence, to their conference? Does Keiser really represent Calvert's true colors?

These few words have only cracked the surface of the outrageous assault that is being perpetrated on what was once a free market. To allow those like Keiser to continue, unexposed, can only lead to financial chaos, destroyed markets, lost jobs, lost dreams, reduced standards of living, and starving people. Of course, as is always the case of those who advocate Sustainable Development, they will tell us all of that misery is necessary, for the public good.


Tom DeWeese is the president of the American Policy Center and publisher/editor of "The DeWeese Report," a monthly public affairs newsletter.

About the Fund...

The Free Enterprise Action Fund is the first mutual fund to seek long term capital appreciation through investment and advocacy that promotes the American system of free enterprise.

Why the Free Enterprise Action Fund? Why now?

Corporations are increasingly under attack by the anti-business movement, i.e., social activists operating under the banners of "Corporate Social Responsibility," (CSR) and "Social Responsible Investing" (SRI). Many of these activists' agendas and tactics threaten businesses, investor interests, jobs, and the free enterprise system.

Why is "Corporate Social Responsibility" a threat?

CSR activists circumvent our democratic process by trying to implement their social agendas through businesses, rather than public political process. They try to force businesses to adopt policies and practices outside existing laws and regulations. These activists define what constitutes "Corporate Social Responsibility" according to their own political and social beliefs, and then pressure corporate managements to adopt their agendas. Targeted corporations - fearing organized boycott, negative publicity, shareholder controversy, litigation, and/or product disparagement - often choose to apprease these activists.

CSR distracts businesses from business. CSR activists and initiatives distract corporate managements from their traditional responsibility of operating businesses in the long-term best interests of investors. CSR can harm a company's ability to conduct business based on sound economics, sound science, and traditional business goals and practices.

| back |